After decades, U.S. wildland firefighters finally get mask protection
Thank you for choosing Automatic Translation. Currently we are offering translations from English into French and German, with more translation languages to be added in the near future. Please be aware that these translations are generated by a third party AI software service. While we have found that the translations are mostly correct, they may not be perfect in every case. To ensure the information you read is correct, please refer to the original article in English. If you find an error in a translation which you would like to bring to our attention, it would help us greatly if you let us know. We can correct any text or section, once we are aware of it. Please do not hesitate to contact our webmaster to let us know of any translation errors.
In a historic shift, the U.S. Forest Service has announced it will begin equipping wildland firefighters with respiratory protection—ending a decades-long ban that left thousands exposed to toxic smoke without masks.
The decision comes amid mounting evidence linking prolonged smoke exposure to cancer, lung disease, and other serious health conditions.
For years, wildland firefighters have battled infernos across the American West with little more than bandanas or neck gaiters to shield their lungs. Unlike their urban counterparts, they were prohibited from wearing respirators due to concerns over cost, logistics, and fears that masks might hinder performance or create liability issues. But the science—and the human toll—has become impossible to ignore.
A Health Crisis Decades in the Making
Recent investigations revealed alarming rates of cancer and respiratory illness among wildland crews. Some studies found that firefighters were inhaling levels of benzene, formaldehyde, and other carcinogens far above occupational safety thresholds. The New York Times profiled several former firefighters who developed rare cancers after years of service, sparking public outcry and renewed scrutiny of agency policies.
One of the most vocal advocates for change has been retired smokejumper Tim Swedberg, who spent years pushing for better protections. “We were told it was just part of the job,” he said. “But breathing poison shouldn’t be a condition of employment.”
What’s Changing Now
The Forest Service will begin rolling out pilot programs in 2026 to test lightweight, fire-resistant respirators designed for wildland conditions. These masks will be optional at first, with training provided to ensure they don’t interfere with mobility or communication. The agency is also investing in better air monitoring, post-deployment health screenings, and long-term medical tracking for seasonal and full-time personnel.
The move is part of a broader overhaul of firefighter support systems, including mental health services, housing stipends, and hazard pay reforms.
A New Era of Accountability
Advocates say the policy reversal is long overdue—and a sign that the government is finally recognizing the sacrifices made by those on the front lines of climate-driven disasters. With wildfires growing more intense and frequent, the need for comprehensive protection is more urgent than ever.
“This is a turning point,” said Kelly Martin, former president of the International Association of Wildland Fire. “We’re finally treating wildland firefighters like the professionals they are.”
You can read the full report in The New York Times and explore additional coverage on firefighter cancer risks and the history of smoke protection bans.
Further Reading:
https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/masking-after-wildfires/
Photo Credit: Creative Commons License
Date: 2016
Source: https://pixabay.com/
Copyright info
This image is from Pixabay and was published prior to July 2017 under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication license https://web.archive.org/web/20161229043156/https://pixabay.com/en/service/terms/ . In July 2017, Pixabay switched the old sitewide license for all uploads from Creative Commons CC0 to a custom license arrangement that does not meet the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication license terms.