Big changes for the US Forest Service as regional offices close down and head office moves to Salt Lake City
Thank you for choosing Automatic Translation. Currently we are offering translations from English into French and German, with more translation languages to be added in the near future. Please be aware that these translations are generated by a third party AI software service. While we have found that the translations are mostly correct, they may not be perfect in every case. To ensure the information you read is correct, please refer to the original article in English. If you find an error in a translation which you would like to bring to our attention, it would help us greatly if you let us know. We can correct any text or section, once we are aware of it. Please do not hesitate to contact our webmaster to let us know of any translation errors.
WASHINGTON — In a controversial move announced late March 2026, the Trump administration has ordered the dismantling of the regional offices of the U.S. Forest Service, relocating its headquarters from Washington, D.C. to Salt Lake City, Utah.
The ten regional offices that have managed the nation’s 193 million acres of public forestland for more than a century.
In the press release from the USDA, it says that " for an agency whose lands, partners, and operational challenges are overwhelmingly concentrated in the West, the shift represents a structural reset and a common-sense approach to improve mission delivery".
Quoting the press release further:
"This is about building a Forest Service that is nimble, efficient, effective and closer to the forests and communities it serves," said Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz, a former logging executive.
"Effective stewardship and active management are achieved on the ground, where forests and communities are found—not just behind a desk in the capital. Through this transition, we will strengthen our connection to the forests and the people who depend on them, while supporting our employees and honouring the dedication that has always defined our service. I’m honoured to help guide this new chapter for the Forest Service, following the vision set forth by President Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot more than a century ago."
Conservation groups condemned the statement as “a desecration” of the agency’s founding principles, which were rooted in protecting forests from industrial exploitation.
According to reporting by Hatch Magazine and many other media outlets, the plan eliminates decades of scientific infrastructure, closing more than fifty research facilities across thirty‑one states and consolidating operations under fifteen newly appointed “state directors.”
These political appointees will be embedded in state capitals, replacing career foresters and scientists who have historically overseen federal forest management.
Critics describe the move as the most extensive purge of a federal land agency in U.S. history.
Conservationists warn that the relocation will trigger mass resignations among experienced staff, mirroring the 87 percent workforce loss that followed the Bureau of Land Management’s headquarters move to Colorado during Trump’s first term.
The administration’s press release framed the overhaul as a “state‑based organizational model” designed to “streamline mission delivery.” However, environmental advocates argue that the restructuring effectively transfers control of national forests to state governments and industry interests. Utah Governor Spencer Cox, whose state is currently suing the federal government to seize 18.5 million acres of public land, called the decision “a big win for Utah.”
The reorganization also dissolves the Forest Service’s decentralized research network, long considered the world’s leading source of data on wildfire behavior, watershed health, and climate adaptation. Scientists warn that relocating all research to a single facility in Fort Collins, Colorado, will terminate ongoing long‑term ecological studies that cannot be replicated elsewhere.
Environmental organizations and public‑lands advocates are urging Congress to block funding for the relocation and hold hearings on what they describe as an “executive dismantling” of federal land stewardship.
If implemented, the plan would mark a historic shift in U.S. forest governance—transforming an independent, science‑based agency into a politically directed network aligned with state and industry priorities.
Further Reading:
USDA Press Release: https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/press-releases/2026/03/31/usda-prioritizing-common-sense-forest-management-moves-forest-service-headquarters-salt-lake-city?
https://www.fs.usda.gov/inside-fs/leadership/meet-tom-schultz-21st-chief-forest-service
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Forest_Service
https://www.thewildlifenews.com/2026/04/02/breaking-trump-administration-orders…?
https://apnews.com/article/forest-service-relocation-dc-salt-lake-city-eca93fa0…?